106.11 智慧財產權月刊 VOL.227
11
本月專題
美國法院對於角色著作權保護之判斷標準―
研析美國第九巡迴上訴法院
DC Comics v. Towle
一案
Ϥ̮d֠ϞʔˇкӔΝࣛમ͜౸ᖭᅺၾԉЍу݂ԫʘ
ᅺdϤɚᅺкᓙԉЍ݊щաഹЪᛆ
ڭ
ᚐࣛႾϓdν
ࠑۃ
ʿʘ
Rice
ࣩd
৫ج
Ⴉ
߈މ
ഹᅺٙ
ج
சeᏖഹࠦՈٙᚭஔࢪʘЪ͜
role
ఱίྼ݄ʿ
ڌ
စᚭஔdΪϾd
ڷ
ӻ
ن
݂ԫʕٙᚭஔࢪ
ڷ
ʔՈዹतٙ
ԉЍd˲ၾɓছᚭஔࢪೌମdೌ
ج
ஷཀ౸ᖭᅺdɦՉස
މ
ા
ࠑ
݂
ԫٙಒɿd͵ೌ
ج
ஷཀԉЍу݂ԫᅺʘᏨ᜕dʔաഹЪᛆ
ڭج
ᚐ
22
fՉ
˼ࣩԷνཥᅂ
ݾ
ਿ
Rocky
ʕٙΝΤ˴ԉ
23
f
̤ୋɘԚɪൡ
৫ج
Olson
ࣩ
24
ʿ
Rice
25
ࣩʕ
ڌ
ͪdԉЍတԑ
Ոዹत
א
ԉЍу݂ԫᅺ̙՟ഹЪᛆ
ڭ
ᚐd್ϾՈዹत
ᅺʘ
ࠅ
d
ڷ
ܸԉЍ̀
ࠅ
̂ʱ౸ᖭ˲яତɓ̙
ᄿ፫ᗆٙतᅄdϞա
ڭ
ᚐʘ̙ঐfΪϤd̙પٝՈዹतᅺ
Ч
ض
ᛕ౸ᖭᅺʘlzԨආϾᆽʷкᓙ
ࠅ
dԨ༆Ӕ౸
ᖭᅺೌ
ج
ႭԉЍᏐ༺О၇
ܓ
މ
౸ʘਪᕚdආɓӉᙕᙑԉЍც
Ոྼ
༺ڌ
˲ΝࣛՈ௪௴จٙۜሯʿ̂ʱ౸ᖭ˲яତɓ
̙ᄿ፫ᗆٙतᅄdա
ڭ
ᚐf್ԉЍतᅄ݊щՈɓ
ߧ
dԨ
ڢ
ఊԉ
Ѝ̮ᝈԸк֛dϾცԉЍІՉԱ
ڝ
ʘ݂ԫစආϾяତٙɓʘतሯd
ν
ࠑۃ
ٙ
Eleanor
ʿཥᅂ
007
ʕٙ༗֍ɻᕼᅃ
26
fΪϤdՈዹतٙк
ᓙЧ֠ც༧݂ԫઋືϔf
22
Rice v. Fox Broadcasting Co., 330 F. 3d 1170 (9th Cir. 2003). (the magician is dressed in standard
magician garb-black tuxedo with tails, a white tuxedo shirt, a black bow tie, and a black cape with
red lining and his role is limited to performing and revealing the magic tricks. Rice, 148 F.Supp.2d
at 1036. Thus, we must reject Rice's claim that the magician in his video is an “especially distinct”
character differing from an ordinary magician in a manner that warrants copyright protection.) (As
result, he is merely a “chessman in the game of telling the story [and] he is not within the area of the
protection afforded by the copyright.)
23
Anderson v. Stallone, 11 USP Q 2d 1161, at *20-23 (C.D. Cal. Apr. 25, 1989) (The Rocky characters
are one of the most highly delineated group of characters in modern American cinema.) (This Court
also finds that the Rocky characters were so highly developed and central to the three movies made
before Anderson's treatment that they “constituted the story being told”.)
24
Olson v. National Broadcasting Co., 855 F.2d 1446, at 1452 (9th Cir. 1988) (characters that are
“especially distinctive” or the “story being told” receive protection apart from the copyrighted work).
25
Rice v. Fox Broadcasting Co., 330 F. 3d 1170 (9th Cir. 2003).
26
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer v. American Honda Motor Co., 900 F.Supp. 1287, 1295-97 (C.D.Cal.1995).