106.09 智慧財產權月刊 VOL.225
15
本月專題
進步性判斷方式及論理之探討―以發明專利進步性審查基準修訂為例
一、進步性的判斷步驟
Ӊ
1
ᆽ֛͡ሗਖ਼лʘ೯ٙᇍఖอᄣ˖οႭd˸ԴՉlz࢙һᆽ
41
f
Ӊ
2
ᆽ֛ᗫ
ۃ
Ҧஔ
౧ה
ᚣʘlz࢙d੶ሜ
ڷ
˸༈೯
᙮ה
Ҧஔჯਹ
ʕՈϞஷ੬ٝᗆ٫ਿ͡ሗࣛʘஷ੬ٝᗆdଣ༆ᗫ
ۃ
Ҧஔʕ
౧ה
ᚣٙlz
࢙dܼ̍
ה
Ϟٙͪ
ܔא
ᙄfΪϤd፯ቇٙˏᗇࣛd̀Ͻඎ༈ˏᗇ݊щՈ
ϞˀΣͪ
42
d߰Ϟd
ۆ
ʔቇΥਂ
މ
ࣨჶٙˏᗇf
Ӊ
3
ᆽ֛༈೯
᙮ה
ҦஔჯਹʕՈϞஷ੬ٝᗆ٫ʘҦஔ˥d
ࡌ
͍ਿ
ਞϽlze̮
৫ج
кӔdอᄣ
5
ᓃ̙ϽඎٙΪ९
43
dܼ̍
1
༈Ҧஔ
art
ה
ࠦᑗਪᕚʘᗳۨe
2
ۃ
Ҧஔ༆Ӕ༈ഃਪᕚʘҦஔ˓
ݬ
e
3
೯
᙮ה
Ҧ
ஔჯਹʘ௴อ
ܓ
e
4
༈߅Ҧ
technology
ʘልᕏ
ܓ
e
5
༈ჯਹ
field
ྼਕԫ٫ʘԃ˥fϤɗΪ
ڐ
ϋԸϞ௰৷Б݁
৫ج
кӔܸ̈
܄މ
ᝈкᓙආӉ
dᏐᆽͭՈϞஷ੬ٝᗆ٫ʘٝᗆ˥
44
f್Ͼdᝈ࿀̮ਖ਼л҅ٙᄲ
ݟ
ྼਕ
৫جא
кӔ
45
d̙ٝԨ
הڢ
Ϟࣩѩீཀɪ
ࠑ
Ϊ९ʑঐᆽͭஷ੬ٝᗆ٫ٙ
Ҧஔ˥dΪϤd
ࡌ
͍ਿ͵ܸ̈d߰͟ᗫ
ۃ
Ҧஔʘlz࢙уԑ˸ˀ݈
א
Ⴉ֛
༈೯
᙮ה
ҦஔჯਹʕՈϞஷ੬ٝᗆ٫ʘҦஔ˥
46
d
ۆ
̙Бᆽ֛༈Ҧஔ˥d
ೌ̤̮Ͻඎɪ
ࠑ
Ϊ९f
Ӊ
4
ᆽႩ༈೯ၾᗫ
ۃ
Ҧஔ
౧ה
ᚣʘlz࢙ගٙࢨମdอᄣ͟
ᗫ
ۃ
Ҧஔʕ፯̈ቇΥਂ
މ
ආӉкᓙʘሞଣٙˏᗇdԨ͟Չʕ፯֛ɓ
ࡈ
ˏᗇၾ
͡ሗਖ਼лʘ೯ٙҦஔlz࢙ආБࢨମˢ࿁d༈ˏᗇ၈
މ
˴
ࠅ
ˏᗇdՉቱЪ
މ
ሞଣʘˏᗇ၈
މ
Չ˼ˏᗇf
41
੶ሜ
ڷ
ܸሗӋධʘ˖ο
ޢה
֛ٙᇍఖd༈ᇍఖ˸ሗӋධ
މ
d˲ਞୋɓ
2.5
ሗӋධʘ
༆ᙑf
42
2017
ϋ
ࡌو
͍ਿ
3.4.2.1
ˀΣͪ͵ϞႭf
43
USPTO, MPEP 2141.03
at 2100-140
Rev. 07, 2015.11
eҢ௰৷Б݁
৫ج
кӔ
105
кοୋ
503
f
44
௰৷Б݁
৫ج
кӔ
104
кοୋ
214
d
105
кοୋ
503
f
45
It is not necessary to make an explicit statement about the level of ordinary skill if it is clear in light
of the cited prior art. See Union Carbide Corp. v. American Can Co., 724 F.2d 1567, 1573 (Fed. Cir.
1984) (quoting Chore-Time Equipment, Inc. v. Cumberland Corp., 713 F.2d 774).
46
౽ᅆৌପ
৫ج
104
Бਖ਼ൡୋ
34
Ш࿁εҦஔ೯࢝ʊϓᆞd
א
ଡ଼Υഐ
༰؈
̙ཫಂʘҦஔ
ჯਹϾԊdৰ
ڢ
ԫɛϞ
نה
ੂd
ۆ
͟
ۃ
Ҧஔʘ̈dуᏐ̙кᓙ
᙮ה
Ҧஔჯਹʕஷ੬ٝᗆ
٫ʘҦஔ˥̻
މ
Оd͍νɓছ͏Αԫࣩd͵ˡɓɓાОፗɓছΥଣɛ
א
ഛԄ၍ଣɛ
ʘଣ͟ΝfϤ̮dਖ਼лɗྼ͜Ҧஔʘ೯࢝dԨ
߅ڢ
ኪ
ߧ
ʘӋdΪϤྼЪঐɢһ
ޟ
ኪዝ
ʘଢ଼ጐd݂͵
ڢ
ӊɓ
᙮ה
Ҧஔჯਹʕʘஷ੬ٝᗆ٫ѩᏐ˸ኪዝʿዝʘഐΥ˙ό̋˸
ࠑ
f