智慧財產權月刊 225 期

15 /92

106.09 智慧財產權月刊 VOL.225 15
本月專題
進步性判斷方式及論理之探討―以發明專利進步性審查基準修訂為例
一、進步性的判斷步驟
Ӊ᜷ 1˜ᆽ֛͡ሗਖ਼лʘ೯׼ٙᇍఖ™อᄣ˖οႭ׼d˸ԴՉlz࢙һ׼ᆽ 41f
Ӊ᜷ 2˜ᆽ֛޴ᗫ΋ۃҦஔ౧הᚣʘlz࢙™d੶ሜڷ˸༈೯׼᙮ה Ҧஔჯਹ
ʕՈϞஷ੬ٝᗆ٫ਿ׵͡ሗࣛʘஷ੬ٝᗆdଣ༆޴ᗫ΋ۃҦஔʕ ౧הᚣٙ዆᜗lz
࢙dܼ̍הϞٙ઺ͪܔאᙄfΪϤd፯኿ቇ຅ٙˏᗇࣛd̀඲Ͻඎ༈ˏᗇ݊щՈ
ϞˀΣ઺ͪ 42d߰ϞdۆʔቇΥਂމࣨჶٙˏᗇf
Ӊ᜷ 3˜ᆽ֛༈೯׼᙮הҦஔჯਹʕՈϞஷ੬ٝᗆ٫ʘҦஔ˥๟™dࡌ͍ਿ
๟ਞϽ਷lze̮৫جкӔdอᄣ 5 ᓃ̙ϽඎٙΪ९ 43dܼ̍€1༈Ҧஔ€art 
הࠦᑗਪᕚʘᗳۨe€2΋ۃҦஔ༆Ӕ༈ഃਪᕚʘҦஔ˓ ݬe€ 3೯׼᙮ה Ҧ
ஔჯਹʘ௴อ஺ ܓe€ 4༈߅Ҧ€technologyʘልᕏ ܓe€5༈ჯਹ€field
ྼਕ੽ԫ٫ʘ઺ԃ˥๟fϤɗΪڐ ϋԸϞ௰৷Б݁৫جкӔܸ̈܄މᝈкᓙආӉ
׌dᏐ΋ᆽͭ˜ՈϞஷ੬ٝᗆ٫™ʘٝᗆ˥๟ 44f್Ͼdᝈ࿀਷̮ਖ਼л҅ٙᄲ ݟ
ྼਕ৫جאкӔ 45d̙ٝԨהڢϞࣩ΁ѩ඲ீཀɪ ࠑΪ९ʑঐᆽͭஷ੬ٝᗆ٫ٙ
Ҧஔ˥๟dΪϤd ࡌ͍ਿ๟͵ܸ̈d߰͟޴ᗫ΋ ۃҦஔʘlz࢙уԑ˸ˀ݈א Ⴉ֛
༈೯׼᙮ה ҦஔჯਹʕՈϞஷ੬ٝᗆ٫ʘҦஔ˥๟ 46dۆ̙஽Бᆽ֛༈Ҧஔ˥๟d
ೌ඲̤̮ϽඎɪࠑΪ९f
Ӊ᜷ 4˜ᆽႩ༈೯׼ၾ޴ᗫ΋ ۃҦஔ౧הᚣʘlz࢙ගٙࢨମ™dอᄣ඲͟޴
ᗫ΋ۃҦஔʕ፯̈ቇΥਂމආӉ׌кᓙʘሞଣٙˏᗇdԨ͟Չʕ፯֛ɓ ࡈˏᗇၾ
͡ሗਖ਼лʘ೯׼ٙҦஔlz࢙ආБࢨମˢ࿁d༈ˏᗇ၈މ˜˴ࠅˏᗇ™dՉቱЪމ
ሞଣʘˏᗇ၈މ˜Չ˼ˏᗇ™f
41 ੶ሜڷ ܸሗӋධʘ˖οޢה֛ٙᇍఖd༈ᇍఖ˸ሗӋධމ ๟d˲඲ਞ๫ୋɓ௝ 2.5˜ሗӋධʘ
༆ᙑ™f
42 2017 ϋࡌو͍ਿ๟׵ 3.4.2.1˜ˀΣ઺ͪ™͵ϞႭ׼f
43 USPTO, MPEP 2141.03€ at 2100-140€Rev. 07, 2015.11 eҢ਷௰৷Б݁৫ج кӔ 105 кοୋ
503 ໮f
44 ௰৷Б݁৫جкӔ 104 кοୋ 214 ໮d105 кοୋ 503 ໮f
45 It is not necessary to make an explicit statement about the level of ordinary skill if it is clear in light
of the cited prior art. See Union Carbide Corp. v. American Can Co., 724 F.2d 1567, 1573 (Fed. Cir.
1984) (quoting Chore-Time Equipment, Inc. v. Cumberland Corp., 713 F.2d 774).
46 ౽ᅆৌପ৫ج 104 Бਖ਼ൡୋ 34 ໮˜Ш࿁஢εҦஔ೯࢝ʊ޴຅ϓᆞdא ଡ଼Υഐ༰؈ ̙ཫಂʘҦஔ
ჯਹϾԊdৰڢ ຅ԫɛϞنהੂdۆ͟΋ۃҦஔʘ౤̈dуᏐ̙кᓙ᙮ה Ҧஔჯਹʕஷ੬ٝᗆ
٫ʘҦஔ˥̻މОd͍νɓছ͏Αԫࣩ΁d͵ˡ඲ɓɓા׼ОፗœɓছΥଣɛ™אœഛԄ၍ଣɛ™
ʘଣ͟޴ΝfϤ̮dਖ਼лɗྼ͜Ҧஔʘ೯࢝dԨ߅ڢኪ฽ߧʘ৛ӋdΪϤྼЪঐɢһޟ ׵ኪዝ
ʘଢ଼ጐd݂͵ڢӊɓ΁᙮הҦஔჯਹʕʘஷ੬ٝᗆ٫ѩᏐ˸ኪዝʿ຾ዝʘഐΥ˙ό̋˸౜ࠑ f™