7
本月專題
美國專利舉發制度及其相關爭議問題簡介――以多方複審(
IPR
)案件為中心
105.09 智慧財產權月刊 VOL.213
৷
7
ഃΪ९dᜑ್ʊϓ
މ
͏ԫ
ڧ
ᛆѓʘ௰ϞɢˀՓ˓
ݬ
8
d̋ɪᗫ
৫ج
Ԉ༆ʥ
ᚃ೯࢝ʕdɗ
ߕމ
ਖ਼лྼਕ
ޢ
ᗫ
ء
ʘೊᓃdϾՉᄲ
ݴݟ
ʘண
ࠇ
˸ʿᗫٙ
PTAB
ᄲ
ݟ
ྼਕЪ
ج
d࿁Ңʘᑘ೯Փ
אܓ
Ϟ
࠽
ਞϽʘஈdɗ
މ
͉˖ʘࠠᓃf
͉˖˸ɨୋ൩ʱਗ਼ఱ
IPR
e
PGR
ʿ
CBM
ɧ၇ࣩʘ˴
ࠅ
ࢨମʚ˸ʧୗd
Ͼ͟Ϥɧ၇ࣩʘᄲଣҏɽ
ߧ
Νd͉˖ୋਞʱਗ਼ࠠᓃ׳ίͦ
ۃ
ࣩᅰඎ
௰εe௰ᄿ
މ
༶͜ʘ
IPR
ࣩdˈՉ݊
IPR
ࣩٙᄲ
ݴݟ
d௰
ܝ
ୋໍʱ
ۆ
̈
ߕ
IPR
Փ
ܓ
ၾҢᑘ೯Փ
ܓ
ʘˢ༰Ъ
މ
ഐሞf
貳、
IPR
與
PGR
、
CBM
案件之簡要比較
IPR
e
PGR
e
CBM
ࣩʘᄲଣ
ݴ
Ԩೌࢨମdѩ
މ
̡
ج
ҏd݊˸Ϥɧ၇ࣩ
ί
PTAB
ᄲ
ݟ
ӻʕ୕၈
މ
ᄲк
trial
ᗳࣩۨdՉሯϞй࿁ࣨჶஈʱ
9
ʔ
ה
ʘɪൡ
appeal
ᗳࣩۨfɽϾԊdᒱ್
PGR
e
IPR
e
CBM
ѩ᙮ਖ਼
лࣨ
ܝࡘ
ʘልᄲՓ
ܓ
dШ
PGR
ࣩʘ̈ࣛᓃࠢՓ
މ
ਖ਼лࣨ
ܝࡘ
ٙ
9
ࡈ
˜ಂගlzd
݂̙ਗ਼
PGR
ଣ༆
މ
ᗳЧҢତʊᄻৰʘମᙄՓ
ܓ
dϾ
IPR
e
CBM
ѩᗳЧҢ
ٙᑘ೯Փ
ܓ
d̥݊
CBM
සঐఱਠุ˙
ج
ਖ਼л̈f
7
༟ࣘԸ๕Ν
ۃ
ൗf߰˸ᐏ௰Ӕ֛ʘ
IPR
ࣩᅰ
988
୕
ࠇ
d
ۆ
ЇˇϞ
1
ሗӋධႩ
֛ೌࣖ٫ʘࣩᅰЦ
86%
846
f߰˸ሗӋධᅰ
ࠇ
ʘd
ۆ
ࣩͭԨᐏ௰Ӕ֛ʘ
IPR
ࣩᐼ
ࠇ
20991
ሗӋධdϞ
50%
Ⴉ֛
މ
ೌࣖ
10597
ධf
8
ኽ୕
ࠇ
d
ߒ
86.7%
ʘ
IPR
ʿ
CBM
ࣩή˙
৫ج
ऒϞ࿁Ꮠʘ
ڧ
ᛆൡதࣩf̤
70%
ʘ
IPR
ࣩd
77.9%
ʘ
CBM
ࣩdᑘ೯ɛΝࣛ
މ
͏ԫൡதʘѓf
See Vishnubhakat, Saurabh
and Rai, Arti K. and Kesan, Jay P.,
Strategic Decision Making in Dual PTAB and District Court
Proceedings
, p.20-24 (February 10, 2016), available at SSRN:
http://ssrn.com/abstract=2731002(last visited July 18, 2016).
9
Էν͡ሗࣩeΎ೯ᗇ
reissue
ࣩ
א
Ύᄲ
ݟ
reexam
ࣩf