Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  8 /94 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 8 /94 Next Page
Page Background

8

本月專題

論說明書中所載之先前技術—以智慧財產法院行政判決

99

年度

行專訴字第

129

號、

103

年度行專訴字第

84

號為探討核心

105.04 智慧財產權月刊 VOL.208

一、先前技術之揭露義務

͟༈΋

ۃ

Ҧஔʘˏ͜ʘʞᗙ҅జѓlzd೯ତ༱Ϟ͡ሗɛᏐˏ͜΋

ۃ

Ҧஔ˸ଣ

ה༆

ሗ೯׼dԨᏍпᄲ

ݟ

ʘਖ਼л

ج

޴ᗫ஝֛d༈Ԭ஝֛ʱйႭ׼νɨjᆄ

ݲ

ਖ਼л

ʮ

ߒ

83

ૢ஝֛Ⴍ׼ࣣᏐ̂ʱা༱dၾҢ਷ਖ਼л

ج

26

ૢୋ

1

ධ஝֛ᗳЧd˲

ݲ

ਖ਼лʮ

ߒ

݄Б୚

ۆ

42

€

1

€

b

͵ආɓӉ஝֛d͡ሗɛᏐ׵Ⴍ׼ࣣʕܸ̈

ה

ٝʘ

౻ߠ

Ҧஔd˸͜ԸᏍпଣ༆

ה

ሗ೯׼eႡЪᆄ

ݲ

Ꮸ॰జѓ˸ʿᄲ

ݟ

ݲ

ਖ਼л

͡ሗࣩ

4

fϤ̮dᄲ

ݟ

ɛࡰϞ̙ঐึ

Ӌ͡ሗɛ

͍΋

ۃ

Ҧஔd߰͡ሗɛ͊፭ృ

ࠅ༈

Ӌd

א

˸͊̂ʱ˙όΫᏐd

ۆ

͡ሗࣩਗ਼஗ࣨჶf

˚͉त஢

ج

36

ૢୋ

4

ධୋ

2

5

ܸ̈d͡ሗɛ̀඲ίਖ਼л͡ሗʘࣛႭ׼׵

͡ሗࣛʊ຾ٝወeʮකٙ޴ᗫ΋

ۃ

Ҧஔ̈ஈഃৃࢹdϾՉᄲ

ݟ

ܸ

ی

II

௅ʱୋ

1

௝ୋ

3

௅ʱ

6

ܸ̈dԱ๫त஢

ج

36

ૢୋ

4

ධୋ

2

ಛ஝֛dႭ׼ࣣ̀඲౧ͪ΋

ۃ

Ҧஔ˖ᘠdආϾ౛౥

ה

ሗ೯׼ʘҦஔࠠ

׌eҦஔ্ᘠഃiϤ̮d༈Ԭ΋

ۃ

Ҧஔ

ɰ̙͜Ը൙П

ה

ሗ೯׼݊щՈϞอ጑׌eආӉ׌f݂া༱׵Ⴍ׼ࣣʕʘ΋

ۃ

Ҧஔd

ʔ̥Ϟп׵ਖ਼л͡ሗࣩʘᄲ

ݟ

d͵̙͍ᆽ൙П

ה

ሗ೯׼ၾ΋

ۃ

Ҧஔගʘᗫ

ڷ

ଣ༆

ה

ሗ೯׼ʿଣ༆νОႡிྼ݄dϾၪܵ༈೯׼ਖ਼лᛆʘᖢ֛׌f

4

EPC Rule 42 (1)(b) ((1)The description shall:

n

(b)indicate the background art which, as far as is

known to the applicant, can be regarded as useful to understand the invention, draw up the European

search report and examine the European patent application

n

).

5

36

ૢnn€

4



ۃ

ධୋ

3

ಛٙ೯׼ٙ༉୚Ⴍ׼d̀඲ୌΥ˸ɨ΢ධ஝֛fnn

ɚeν

೯؈

׼݊˖ᘠʮකٙ೯׼€ܸୋ

29

ૢୋ

1

ධୋ

3

ಛ஝֛ٙ೯׼d˸ɨ͉ಛ͵́d૧

ᐏ੻ਖ਼л٫̀඲Ⴍ׼Չίਖ਼л͡ሗʘࣛʊ຾ٝወٙ˖ᘠʮක೯׼

ה

̊೮ٙ̊

ي

ٙΤ၈˸

ʿՉ˼ၾ˖ᘠʮක೯׼Ϟᗫٙ༟ৃٙ̈ஈf຾᏶௅౽ᅆৌପ҅

ج

ਕ܃ᔕᙇd

104

ϋ

07

˜

13

˚fc

6

The information on prior art documents is required for a person skilled in the art and the examiner to

understand what technical significance the invention for which a patent is sought has and what technical

contribution is brought about in light of the state of the art at the time of filing of patent application.

Also, the information on prior art documents is required for the examiner to assess the novelty and

inventive step of the invention for which a patent is sought. Therefore, the disclosure of information

on prior art documents contributes to prompt examination. Moreover, it contributes to stabilization of

the right as accurate evaluation on the relation between the invention for which a patent is sought and

the prior art can be made if the information on prior art documents is stated in the detailed description

of the invention. To that effect, Article 36(4)(ii) prescribes requirements for disclosure of information

on prior art document, Examination Guidelines for Patent and Utility Model in Japan Part II Chapter 1

Section 3.