8
本月專題
論說明書中所載之先前技術—以智慧財產法院行政判決
99
年度
行專訴字第
129
號、
103
年度行專訴字第
84
號為探討核心
105.04 智慧財產權月刊 VOL.208
一、先前技術之揭露義務
͟༈
ۃ
Ҧஔʘˏ͜ʘʞᗙ҅జѓlzd೯ତ༱Ϟ͡ሗɛᏐˏ͜
ۃ
Ҧஔ˸ଣ
ה༆
ሗ೯dԨᏍпᄲ
ݟ
ʘਖ਼л
ج
ᗫ֛d༈Ԭ֛ʱйႭνɨjᆄ
ݲ
ਖ਼л
ʮ
ߒ
ୋ
83
ૢ֛ႭࣣᏐ̂ʱা༱dၾҢਖ਼л
ج
ୋ
26
ૢୋ
1
ධ֛ᗳЧd˲
ᆄ
ݲ
ਖ਼лʮ
ߒ
݄Б
ۆ
42
1
b
͵ආɓӉ֛d͡ሗɛᏐႭࣣʕܸ̈
ה
ٝʘ
౻ߠ
Ҧஔd˸͜ԸᏍпଣ༆
ה
ሗ೯eႡЪᆄ
ݲ
Ꮸ॰జѓ˸ʿᄲ
ݟ
ᆄ
ݲ
ਖ਼л
͡ሗࣩ
4
fϤ̮dᄲ
ݟ
ɛࡰϞ̙ঐึ
ࠅ
Ӌ͡ሗɛ
ࡌ
͍
ۃ
Ҧஔd߰͡ሗɛ͊፭ృ
ࠅ༈
Ӌd
א
˸͊̂ʱ˙όΫᏐd
ۆ
͡ሗࣩਗ਼ࣨჶf
˚͉त
ج
ୋ
36
ૢୋ
4
ධୋ
2
ಛ
5
ܸ̈d͡ሗɛ̀ίਖ਼л͡ሗʘࣛႭ
͡ሗࣛʊٝወeʮකٙᗫ
ۃ
Ҧஔ̈ஈഃৃࢹdϾՉᄲ
ݟ
ܸ
ی
ୋ
II
ʱୋ
1
ୋ
3
ʱ
6
ܸ̈dԱत
ج
ୋ
36
ૢୋ
4
ධୋ
2
ಛ֛dႭࣣ̀౧ͪ
ۃ
Ҧஔ˖ᘠdආϾ
ה
ሗ೯ʘҦஔࠠ
ࠅ
eҦஔ্ᘠഃiϤ̮d༈Ԭ
ۃ
Ҧஔ
ɰ̙͜Ը൙П
ה
ሗ೯݊щՈϞอeආӉf݂া༱Ⴍࣣʕʘ
ۃ
Ҧஔd
ʔ̥Ϟпਖ਼л͡ሗࣩʘᄲ
ݟ
d͵̙͍ᆽ൙П
ה
ሗ೯ၾ
ۃ
Ҧஔගʘᗫ
ڷ
d˸
ଣ༆
ה
ሗ೯ʿଣ༆νОႡிྼ݄dϾၪܵ༈೯ਖ਼лᛆʘᖢ֛f
4
EPC Rule 42 (1)(b) ((1)The description shall:
n
(b)indicate the background art which, as far as is
known to the applicant, can be regarded as useful to understand the invention, draw up the European
search report and examine the European patent application
n
).
5
ୋ
36
ૢnn
4
ۃ
ධୋ
3
ಛٙ೯ٙ༉Ⴍd̀ୌΥ˸ɨධ֛fnn
ɚeν
೯؈
݊˖ᘠʮකٙ೯ܸୋ
29
ૢୋ
1
ධୋ
3
ಛ֛ٙ೯d˸ɨ͉ಛ͵Νd૧
ᐏਖ਼л٫̀ႭՉίਖ਼л͡ሗʘࣛʊٝወٙ˖ᘠʮක೯
ה
̊೮ٙ̊
ي
ٙΤ၈˸
ʿՉ˼ၾ˖ᘠʮක೯Ϟᗫٙ༟ৃٙ̈ஈf౽ᅆৌପ҅
ج
ਕ܃ᔕᙇd
104
ϋ
07
˜
13
˚fc
6
The information on prior art documents is required for a person skilled in the art and the examiner to
understand what technical significance the invention for which a patent is sought has and what technical
contribution is brought about in light of the state of the art at the time of filing of patent application.
Also, the information on prior art documents is required for the examiner to assess the novelty and
inventive step of the invention for which a patent is sought. Therefore, the disclosure of information
on prior art documents contributes to prompt examination. Moreover, it contributes to stabilization of
the right as accurate evaluation on the relation between the invention for which a patent is sought and
the prior art can be made if the information on prior art documents is stated in the detailed description
of the invention. To that effect, Article 36(4)(ii) prescribes requirements for disclosure of information
on prior art document, Examination Guidelines for Patent and Utility Model in Japan Part II Chapter 1
Section 3.